Roles
UAT looks different depending on who owns the outcome.
We adapt to the person carrying the release risk — not just the project. Whether you’re managing delivery, leading QA, or setting the quality bar for an engineering organisation, we work at the level that matters to you.
Talk to the founderWho we work with
One standard. Every role.
Project Managers
You own the go-live. Make sure it lands.
PMs are accountable for release outcomes, not just release dates. We give you independent UAT coverage that surfaces risk before it becomes your post-launch incident.
What we deliver
Business Analysts
You wrote the criteria. Someone else should run the test.
BAs own acceptance criteria and business readiness — but executing the test cycle is a different job. We take the cycle off your hands so you get structured coverage and a sign-off report you can stand behind.
What we deliver
Change Managers
You own adoption. UAT is where you win or lose it.
Change managers are accountable for whether people actually use the system — and that outcome is determined in UAT. We run the test cycle with adoption risk in scope so you get a stable training baseline and the evidence to declare genuine readiness.
What we deliver
Release Managers
You hold the gate. Hold it on evidence.
Release managers carry the go-live decision — and the consequences when it goes wrong. We run the UAT cycle so you have independent test coverage, structured defect disposition, and a go/no-go recommendation you can defend.
What we deliver
QA Leads
Automation covers the known path. We cover the rest.
QA leads own scope, coverage, and the handoff to production — but automation only takes you so far. We run the UAT cycle with the structure and evidence that makes a production go-live defensible.
What we deliver
Engineering Leaders
Ship with confidence, not crossed fingers.
CTOs and VPs of Engineering carry the production risk. We give you independent UAT coverage that acts as a genuine release gate — with risk governance documentation and vendor accountability built in.
What we deliver
Finance Leads
Zero tolerance for calculation errors at month-end.
Finance leads carry accountability for system accuracy in ERP rollouts — and a missed calculation or broken integration can surface at the worst possible moment. We run the UAT cycle so your team can close the books, not run the tests.
What we deliver
Our approach
The same defect means something different to every role.
A PM needs to know if it blocks go-live. A QA lead needs to know how to reproduce it. An engineering leader needs to know what it says about system quality.
We report findings in a way that makes sense to the person responsible for the outcome — not just the person who ran the test.
Release-risk framing
Every finding is mapped to business impact, so you know what to fix before go-live and what can wait.
Role-appropriate reporting
We adapt our output to your audience — executive summary, detailed defect log, or both.
Independent perspective
We're not inside your team's assumptions. That's exactly why we catch what internal testers miss.
Got a release coming up?
Talk to Ash before you flip the switch. 13 years of enterprise UAT — and zero failed go-lives on our watch.
Talk to the founder